Nowadays, there are lots of methods based on different ways of teaching English to children as a foreign language. Many of them are very difficult to apply and not easy to learn for pre-scholars. That is the reason why we have introduced the use of songs in the teaching of English as a foreign language in pre-school, emphasizing the listening skill at Santa Teresa School. This research will provide teachers another way of teaching the English language to students more efficiently and effectively.
Using songs in the classroom is a very easy tool to motivate English students. It works as an ice-breaker against the routine. Songs could be an essential part of English teaching, because it makes the students feel more receptive to the language. No doubt, songs are a good way to teach for they incorporate all the language learning skills: 1- Listening (to songs) 2- Speaking (singing songs) 3- Reading (following the lyrics) 4- Writing (filling in the blanks) With the action of singing and involving movement, the children will feel more confindent of begining to chant or sing as their fear fade away and later on they will be practicing the pronunciation over and over. Chanting and singing also familiarizes the students with the rhythm and intonation of the English language. Eventually, students will increase their interest which will help them learn the language by using those activities Teaching is based on using what children already know and the influence of music on learning is clear, therefore it seems that teachers should be motivated to incorporate songs in the classroom. Statement of the problem From our daily experiences, we found that the process of teaching English in primary schools in the Dominican Republic is not very successful. The educational system is sometimes too boring for the children, so they usually have more problems to learn this foreign language.
English is a tough language to learn when presenting isolated words. That is what you call a boring method. Imagine these words without any context, they would be more difficult to learn. Everybody agrees that the main objective of teaching a foreign language is to use an effectively methodology in the classroom that pre-scholars can understand and retain. However, most of the pre-scholars at Santa Teresa are presenting serious problems to learn this language. We could find many situations in which those students felt bored and did not paid attention to the teacher.
In order to thoroughly understand and study this situation, the following questions will be response in this project:
Why do pre-scholar present lots of difficulties in learning English a foreign language at Santa Teresa School in the first grade?
Which strategies do Santa Teresa School teachers use to teach a foreign language in the 1st grade?
How can we apply the use of songs as a method to teach English as a foreign language in preschool?
What percentage of students in the 1st grades have problem to learn English as a second language at Santa Teresa Schools?
How can the student at Santa Teresa School develop the communication skill by using songs?
How can the students improve the communication skill by listening to songs?
Which difficulties do teachers and students encounter when listening to songs in the teaching and learning interaction?
Which are the benefits that pre-scholars obtain in the process of learning English as a foreign language?
How do the pre-scholars can develop fluency of the target language by using songs?
How can the teachers promote and encourage the communication skill by the use of songs?
General Objective The general objective of this proposal is to determine the importance of using of songs to teach English as a foreign language in 1st grade emphasizing the listening skill at Santa Teresa School. In order to accomplish this general objective, the following specific objectives will be formulated:
To identify the strategies to teach songs to pre-school students emphasizing the listening skill.
Establish the amount of opportunities that Pre-scholars have while learning English lessons in the classroom by using songs as a learning method.
1-To identify if the use of songs is a good strategy in the process of teaching English in first graders in pre-school
2-To establish what kinds of resources are efficient during the process of teaching first graders
3-To determine whether or not it is convenient or helpful to use songs during teaching English while
4To analyze the effect of songs in the teaching of English as a foreign language
5-To demonstrate that children are able to learn a new vocabulary with each song they listen to.
6-To find out how quickly children can learn English through songs
7-To identify the strategies by the use of songs in first graders emphasizing the listening skill to teach
8-To establish the amount of opportunities pre-scholars have in the classroom by using songs as a learning method.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Song: A short musical composition with word.
A song is a relatively relatively short musical composition for the human voice, possibly accompanied by other musical instrument which features words (lyrics).
It is typically for a solo singer, though may also be a duet, trio or more voice (word with more than) one voice to a part, however, are considered choral.
The words of song are typically of a poetic, rhyming nature, although they may be religious verses of free prose song can be broadly divide into different many forms depending on the criteria used , one division is between “art songs “, popular songs and folk songs.
Behaviorism Cognitivism And Constructivism: Educational Technology
Many scholars have commented on how behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism have influenced the research in the field of educational technology. At this point in your student career, you have had an opportunity to read material on each of these learning theories or approaches. How would you describe your beliefs about learning in relation to these theories? How will this choice of beliefs affect your future dissertation work? You may select one or more of the theories listed or provide another that is scholarly and recognized in the literature. Regardless of how you approach your answer, it must define key terms and theorists, provide detailed concrete examples, and must be scholarly in tone. [Important – although this is an open book question, it asks you to state your current beliefs and relate them to works and theorists YOU HAVE ALREADY READ. You may cite them informally. Avoid the temptation to “Google” or “Wikipedia” a theory or theorist and review their works in the limited time that you have. Think about your beliefs, outline your thoughts, and use your resources to further support your argument]
In my first year as a doctoral student at the University of Northern Colorado, I asked Dr. Ku and Dr. Lohr if they thought I was a behaviorist or a constructivist. At the time, I was just beginning to learn about learning theory in a Psychology class, and all the theories in the textbook seemed to make sense when I read about them individually. Throughout my career as a doctoral student I have continually altered my position through various theories. My current understanding and application of learning and its relationship to theories is more pragmatic. I believe that the proper use and application of learning theories depends on the context to which it is applied. What follows is a brief discussion regarding my beliefs about learning in relations to each of these theories.
Behaviorism, popularized in the 1950s and 1960s, is based on an objectivist ontology and empiricist epistemology. Behaviorism draws many of its principles through experimental research in psychology (i.e., Pavlov’s experiment with his dogs). Proponents of behaviorism consider the mind to be tabula rasa, or a blank slate. These include people like John B. Watson, Edward Tolman, Clark Hull, and B. F. Skinner. Skinner, in particular, is famous for introducing operant conditioning, which is where behavior is altered through reinforcement. Programmed instruction is an example of a strategy that uses behaviorist theory.
I believe that the stimulus-response type learning is ineffective, particularly in helping students gain higher order skills. However, I do believe that behaviorist learning principles can be applied to certain disciplines for specific purposes. For example, acquiring typing skills is an example that is often brought up by those in favor of direct instruction. Also, in secondary language learning, rote memorization of vocabulary is necessary in becoming a proficient communicator in a different language. In such cases, direct instruction and rote memorization are good strategies of teaching and learning.
Information processing theory is often tied to cognitivitist learning theory. The Atkinson-Shiffrin Memory Model from the late 1960s introduces the various stages of information processing from sensory input to long-term memory. According to their model, there are three types of memory: sensory memory, working memory, and long-term memory. Sensory memory holds information only for a brief amount of time. When processed, information goes to working memory. Working memory, which consists of short-term memory and short-term store, is the stage where more processing occurs. George A. Miller introduced the magic number seven plus or minus two to indicate the bits of information that can be processed through working memory. Paivio’s dual-coding theory suggests that there are two channels from which information becomes processed: visual and auditory. Cognitive capacity can be maximized by using both of the channels.
Using strategies such as rehearsal and chunking, information becomes transferred to long-term memory. Long-term memory is where knowledge is permanently stored. It is believed that once information is stored in long-term memory, it is never lost. However, information from long-term memory must be stored efficiently to enable easy retrieval. Endel Tulving’s discovery of episodic and semantic memory suggested that there were two information processing systems in long-term memory. Episodic memory was for specific events and semantic memory is general information. In education, the focus is on semantic memory.
My personal belief about cognitivism is that it strengthens our understanding of learning from where behaviorist left off, and that its concepts can be applied to constructivist methodology. Behaviorists believed that the mind was a blank box and, thus, minimized its importance as a function of learning. However, when cognitivists opened the box, it revealed cognitive processes that could better describe human learning and engagement.
I think about the education system in Japan where there was a nationalized policy to reduce the number of information that students would have to learn. At the time, everyone believed it was a reasonable solution to the problem that Japanese students were only memorizing a large load of information without being able to apply it effectively. The idea was to lower the number of facts, rules and principles to study, and spend more time connecting larger ideas. Unfortunately summative evaluation revealed that students were not learning any better than they were before. One observation can be made from this failed policy. The Japanese policymakers failed to understand that the number of information bits was far less important than finding ways to chunk information. This illustrates that, whether the learning environment is a lecture or a dynamic debate, teachers have the power to transmit knowledge or facilitate an environment that reduces cognitive load.
Constructivism is a theory with the fundamental belief that knowledge is constructed by the individual and that it is a continuous process. There are a number of types of constructivism. Trivial constructivism is a combination of information processing and knowledge construction by the individual. Radical constructivism is attributed to von Glasersfeld and the idea that knowledge is constructed based on individual experiences. Social constructivism is attributed to Vygotsky, emphasizing the idea that knowledge is a shared experience between people. Situativity theory, which is associated to the works of Lave and Wenger, can be argued as another type of constructivism where the emphasis is on social and physical context.
Constructivist learning theory should not be confused with constructivist methods of instruction. Generally, constructivist methods assume a) students are naturally motivated; b) students actively construct method, rather than have it transmitted by someone else; c) meaning is created through connecting new information with prior knowledge; d) knowledge can be personally or socially constructed; and e) knowledge is best constructed in authentic learning contexts where ill structured problems parallel real life issues and problems.
Problem-based learning (PBL), which has been extensively studied by Jonassen is an example of constructivism. PBL focuses on a specific problem to be solved. Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is another type of constructivist learning strategy. IBL, which is similar to PBL, focuses on questioning and defending an answer to a problem based on evidence. Discovery learning promotes deep learning through student engagement.
I believe that constructivism is appropriate for the changing nature of learners in a society that is changing rapidly. When I was in high school, plagiarism in an English class meant that a student had copied off of another student or had copied off of Cliff notes. However, with the prevalent use of the Internet, not only are book notes available, but also, discourse and feedback to those books, mp3 and YouTube videos that helps describe or create mental models, among many other ways in which information is delivered. Thus, it seems as though finding the correct answer is less important than finding a good answer supported by good evidence. Acquisition and transfer of such skills will be fundamental for a student’s life-long process of learning.
My current topic of interest for my dissertation is researching a constructivist charter school and better understanding how inquiry-based learning is being used as a method of instruction. In particular, I am interested in the different experiences of the administrators, teachers, and students, and how the interactions among them create a community of learning. I believe that my pragmatic belief and approach to understanding learning theory can be applied in two ways.
First, understanding constructivist principles will help me better understand my position as a researcher using a constructivist methodology to analyze whether or not inquiry-based learning is indeed being effectively and efficiently utilized in the classrooms. Also, I will be interested in seeing whether or not direct instruction-type methods are being utilized for lower-level or rudimentary skills. Many constructivists do not deny the fact that direct instruction could be useful in certain learning environments. I would like to see how and when different learning methods to instruction are used to maximize learning.
In conclusion, I was reading the Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, I was surprised to find that in the glossary of terms, there was no definition for the word learning. My understanding is that learning varies, based on context and purpose. I believe that we no longer live in a world where there is only one solution to a problem. Perhaps my current research in constructivism has affected the way I perceive the educational experience. Nonetheless, I firmly believe that it is important to be able to understand and apply the different theories based on the fundamental goal of helping students become successful not only during their studies, but also, after their studies as well.