Get help from the best in academic writing.

Thruth in Drama Report

The extent of a truth in logic is elucidated by the ‘truth’ value of a logical statement. In most instances, either “false” or “true” is used to expose the truth value. In the case of “In a groove”, “Tajomaru raped Masago” is true since Tajomaru actually raped Masago and thus would be considered a falsehood if he did not rape her.

However, the truth value may be supplementary values also, especially in multi-valued logics. This mostly occurs in cases where a numerical value is used to state how true the issue may be. In these particular instances, where the value is between zero (0) and one (1), one would be used to state that it is utterly correct and zero would indicate that it is completely false.

In certain situations where the circumstances are such that they may require further scrutiny for verification, the statement may be considered half way false and at the same time half way true, thereby placing the truth value at 0.5. To establish a logic truth as being valuation worthy, one does not require truth values in an exceptional sense.

The correlation between creative writing and truth has for a long time been quite impulsive. If the raconteur cheats about the fable being true, which of course would only be meaningful in the event of the literary globe maintaining its own values of truth, then fiction would be considered as being real in the world that it formulates. In any case, creative writing is taken as being neither a falsehood nor being true. Rather, it is somewhere in the midst of the two states.

In this particular narrative, the rudiments that we would consider as being the truth statements include;

Tajamoru and Masago left at different times.

Even though the aspects would differ, Masago seemed inclined to the fact that she wished Takehiko would die according to all the separate accounts.

Masago’s horse as well as Takehito’s quiver and his bow were stolen by the same person who was Tajomaru.

Masago was desecrated by Tajamoru.

Takehiko died.

The duo was led into the forest by Tajomoru.

There appear several discrepancies in the cast’s tales regarding the goings-on and they vary from the minute details right up to the vital aspects of the tale. There are so many inconsistencies that emanate from the different versions that are given by the characters in their statements regarding the happenings. For example;

The statement that Masago gave totally left out the fact that she carried out an elongated discussion with Tajomaru subsequent to the rape ordeal and consequently she was willing to leave with Tajomaru on condition of her husband’s death.

The clergyman who was passing through stated that he very unambiguously saw more than twenty arrows in the gentleman’s quiver, quite contrary to what the bounty hunter said he counted which was slightly less.

The final statement is delivered to the reader by the late Takehiko’s ghost and this is facilitated by a go-between of the spirit world. Takehito, through the go-between, shows apparent disdain for his wife in the course of his narration of his version of the story.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More This indicates that each individual in the cast narrates a certain fact that they deem a truth but is contradicted by another person thus making it a falsehood. In actual sense, the ethical contradictions in the narrative may be much more crucial than the literal ones.

In an effort to cover up their own dishonesty, it is quite evident that the characters have all switched their statements exposing the fact that they are ethically and morally corrupted. This situation abandons the person reading the story without the ability to pin point who is specifically responsible for what in an objective manner.

In a synopsis, it is their emotions that guide the reader in making a decision as to who on a literal point, is telling the truth since it is the emotions that make them believe in one specific person much more than the rest.

This comprehension dawns on the reader almost at the close of the narrative as they find out that they are not able to garner enough verification that may enable them decipher who is literally right. The need for prejudice as well as self rationalization rather than truth as well as facts to decide what may or may not be true is what drives the reader to discover that they need to acknowledge the reality that they themselves are also ethically compromised in a way.

In the final analysis, as stated by one critique of narratives, he points out the fact that a complete unit is not the computation of its distinct divisions. Rather it is the disputed correlation that exists amidst the said parts.

The anonymous critique signs of by broaching the question that inquires on ways that people (we) may be able to set a basis to go by through narrative that may shift people (us) down as a discursive anthology of persons who are apt to the task as well as the outfit that may enable them advance on the current troubles that affect them.

Ethical Issues Facing Social Researchers Essay

Nursing Assignment Help Table of Contents Introduction

Ethical Issues

Ethical Dilemma

Conclusion

References

Introduction Research refers to a systematic study aimed at making new discoveries or arriving at a dependable solution through an accurate gathering, analysis and interpretation of information. Research can be adventurous and fun because a researcher gets to learn so much and interact with new aspects and concepts which are previously unknown. However, researchers face numerous ethical issues whenever they are conducting research and this is the focus of this discussion.

Ethical Issues One of the ethical issues that researchers face is getting participants in their research (Babbie, 2008, p.45). There is an ethical principle in social research known as voluntariness. This principle requires that any participant to a research must participate willingly without being coerced, forced or induced.

This is especially in cases where researchers would use prisoners or students in learning institutions for their researches. In line with this is a principle, it will no longer be possible for researcher to conduct any kind of research until those participating show willingness to do so without any kind of inducement such as monetary promises.

The other ethical issue when it comes to social research is the issue of informed consent. This simply means that social researchers and indeed any researcher must ensure that all their participants have a clear understanding of the kind of activity they are engaging in prior to them participating in the research. All participants should be well aware of the nature of the research and the likely consequences they are likely to face whether positive or negative.

The ethics that are applicable in social research also require that researchers take due caution and protect their participants from any potential harm or risk (Babbie, 2010, p.56).

The harm in this case refers to both psychological as well as physical. In ensuring that the participants in a research are fully protected, researchers are required to maintain a high level of confidentiality thereby ensuring that the information provided by the participants is not released to nay other person. Further, researchers can only use such information obtained only for the purposes of research only.

Social researchers are also required in some cases to ensure that their participants are anonymous. This means that their identity is not known and this is especially because of the nature of research which may involve release of highly confidential information. This ensures that participants in a research study are not later victimized based on the information they provided.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Ethical Dilemma While there are well laid down ethical rules and standards which social researchers are required to observe when conducting their research, there are times that the need to e accurate and therefore obtain valid result may require the researcher to overlook some of the ethical standards (Kimmel, 1988, p.55). It is in this case that researchers face an ethical dilemma where one hand, they need to abide by the ethical standards while on the other hand, there is need to obtain accurate information regarding the study.

Conclusion Ethics is about what is right or wrong, good or bad. In this case, social researchers are faced with challenges whenever there is a dilemma of observing the ethical standards and obtaining correct information. It may not be possible to give a specific position considering that ethics is wide. Therefore, one may have to deal with a specific issue depending on the circumstances of the case.

One aspect that I found quite interesting as far as research ethics is the fact that it is sometimes caught between a rock and hard place in the sense that there is a dilemma between wanting to protect those participating in the study while at the same time there is need to get accurate results.

It therefore becomes very tricky at times for researchers. What I found disturbing in research ethics is the fact that sometimes researchers flout the standards of ethics in an attempt to get accurate results. It therefore becomes quite disturbing as one wonders where a balance can be struck between getting accurate results and remaining ethical

References Babbie, E. (2008) The basis of social research. New York: CengageBrain.com.

Babbie, E. (2010) The practice of social research. New York: CengageBrain.com.

Kimmel, A. (1988) Ethics and value in applied social research. London: Sage.

We will write a custom Essay on Ethical Issues Facing Social Researchers specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More

[casanovaaggrev]