The Main Components of the Syllable A syllable refers to a rhythmic element of language that occurs to create an easy flow in the speech stream for the human brain to comprehend (Odden, 2005). It is often made up of parts also known as segments or components. Each word comprises one or more syllables.
A syllable has a structure that can be split into individual components. These components consist of rhyme and onset. The rhyme is further categorized into two elements. The nucleus is the first element, whereas the coda is the second element. It is worth noting that not all syllables contain these components and that there is a likelihood of the occurrence of a small syllable that is only made up of a nucleus.
The onset, which marks the beginning sound when pronouncing a syllable, comes before the nucleus. In English, the onset components of syllables are often consonants. However, some consonants such as n, m, l, r alongside the velar nasal sometimes constitute the nucleus within a syllable. An example of an onset in a syllable is ‘r’ in the word ‘read.’ In the event that a word is made up of more than one syllable, each individual syllable comprises the normal syllable parts. For instance, window is pronounced as win.dow.
Rhyme includes the remaining part of the syllable after the onset is pronounced. It is subdivided into nucleus and coda. The nucleus is the fundamental part of a syllable that is essential for the existence of the syllable. The nucleus often bears a high pitch and can be slightly louder than other parts of the syllable.
Vowels make up a large number of nuclei in syllables. However, the velar nasal (‘ng’), the nasals and the liquids sometimes form the nuclei of syllables in English words. The coda is the ultimate part of the syllable that comprises the last consonant or consonant group.
Here is an example of the syllable components of the word ‘read.’
Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Onset [r] Rhyme [id] Nucleus [i] Coda [d] The Difference between Marked and Unmarked Syllable Forms
A syllable form that is avoided in unconnected languages is thought to be marked in comparison to the syllables that are not avoided (Kager, 2004). Conversely, the syllables that are not avoided are seen as unmarked. Syllables without onsets are marked in comparison with syllables that have onsets.
Though syllables without onsets occur, they are predisposed to elimination. In addition, syllables that contain codas are more conspicuous than open syllables. Though every language permits the use of open syllables, some languages such as Shona do not allow the use of closed syllables. The languages that permit the application of codas syllabify VCV as V.CV.
Regressive and Progressive Assimilation
Assimilation refers to the progression of sound variation where a certain sound is prompted or transformed by other sounds (Ladefoged, 2006). It is a conventional phonological occurrence where one sound is influenced by other sounds. The process of assimilation can happen within one word or among several words. The assimilation can be regressive, progressive or from a distance.
In regressive assimilation, the change in a phoneme is influenced by another phoneme that occurs after the modified phoneme. Regressive assimilation is often referred to as anticipatory assimilation or right-to-left assimilation due to the nature of the modifying phonemes. The sound change in this form of assimilation occurs backwards. An example of a regressive assimilation is in the pronunciation of the words ‘have to.’ ‘Have’ in this case is pronounced as ‘haf’ and is influenced by the letter ‘t’ in ‘to.’
Progressive assimilation is different from regressive assimilation in that the modification takes place in the onward process. In some unique scenarios, the two assimilating sounds display mutual inspiration. Though assimilation often happens between adjoining phonemes, it can happen between phonemes that are split up by other sounds. This type of assimilation is referred to as assimilation from a distance.
Unconditioned versus Conditioned Sound Change
A sound change is an occurrence in phonology that is generally accepted by all people who subscribe to a language or dialect. Modifications in sounds progressively circulate from one speaker to another in a wavelike design until the changes are adopted by all users of the language or dialect. This implies that sound changes do not just occur spontaneously in all languages.
The dependence or independence between the phonological progression that generates the modification in sound and the phonetic background in which change occurs determine whether a sound change is conditioned or unconditioned. A conditioned change in sound, therefore, occurs in a process that depends on the phonetic environment. On the contrary, the occurrence of an unconditioned sound change is not dependent on the phonetic environment.
We will write a custom Assessment on Syllables in phonology specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More An example of a conditioned change in sound is in assimilation where two different sounds become similar or influence each other as they become close to each other. Conditional sound changes also include insertion, deletion and disambiguation of sounds depending on the phonetic environment.
An example of an unconditioned sound change is metathesis where the order of sound changes. Raising or lowering the position of the tongue produces variations in sounds. Metathesis can also be achieved by moving the tongue forward or backwards. An example is evident in the pronunciation of the word ‘pat.’
Similarities between English and Arabic Syllables
English and Arabic speeches consider syllables as phonological elements on which words are constructed (Ladefoged, 2006). The two languages regard the syllable as the foundational unit on which the sequence, stress patterns and prosody of a language are constructed. English phonology views the syllable as an intricate element comprising the nucleus and the coda.
The Arabic language views the syllable as a unit according to each language. This implies that every language possesses its unique arrangements of vowels and consonants among other characteristics such as stress, length and intonation.
In English and Arabic, the syllable is seen as a phonological element made up of a vowel, which produces the nucleus, and a consonant that forms the coda and the onset. Both languages treat codas and onsets as categories of sound that precede and follow the peak. While the English syllable comprises a consonant and a rhyme made up of a compulsory nucleus and an optional coda, the Arabic language regards the syllable as an organized balance of analytic elements that rely on consonants (sawamit) and vowels (sawait).
The vowel (in Arabic) takes the peak position between the consonants that act as bases for the syllable. However, the Arabic syllable is an essential element of the structure. Unlike English, Arabic does not perceive the syllable as an independent morpheme.
Syllables are important elements in phonology and in the development of any language. The components of syllables vary in different languages and assist in the pronunciation of certain words.
References Kager, R. (2004). Optimality theory. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Not sure if you can write a paper on Syllables in phonology by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics. Boston, MA: Thomson.
Odden, D. (2005). Introducing phonology: A practical course. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
7 Deadly Sins of Meetings Essay
Nursing Assignment Help Introduction Meetings are very important in a day to day running of any organization. Managers have to gather meetings once in a while to discuss various issues that may affect their organization and come up with possible solutions to these issues (Henkel 2007). It is important to make sure that these meetings are interesting. It is, therefore, important that people who are tasked with the responsibility of organizing meetings are able to avoid the seven deadly sins of meetings.
I have recently attended a meeting in my neighborhood that was address the rising cases of insecurity and how well the problem should be solved. The organizers of the meeting simply went from door to door informing people of where the meeting would take place, the agenda of the meeting and the time the meeting would start. Since we are all affected by the issue of insecurity, I decided to attend the meeting alongside my parents.
However, the organizers of the meeting committed one of the seven deadly sins of meeting. The meeting took too long. People became restless and one by one they began leaving the venue. The organizers had not taken into account the fact that people had other important matters to attend too.
There were too many speakers in the meeting. As a result, it was a total failure as the earlier set objectives were not met. This is because by the time the organizers had been concluding the meeting, most of the people had already left. It was impossible to make a binding decision in the absence of most residents of the neighborhood.
Still, it would have been possible for the organizers of the meeting to avoid committing the sin had they considered the following factors.
Good time management
The meeting should have taken a maximum of 90 minutes. This is because the meeting comprised of different people who had various commitments elsewhere. Each section of the meeting would have been allocated some definite period of time (Henkel 71). This is important in order to ensure that all the objectives that had been set would be met. This was failed because people spent more time discussing the issues and in the end did not have enough time to come up with solutions to the problem that had been raised.
Proper use of technology
The use of technology would have also helped a great deal. The organizers of the meeting should have hired a sound system assistant and acquire the appropriate technology to make sure that everyone was able to hear what was being discussed. I think it would have also helped a lot by using a projector to help highlight some of the main points that were being discussed.
Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Limiting the number of speakers
The organizers should have also ensured that hey limited the number of people to address the meeting. Most of the people who addressed the meeting kept on repeating some of the things that the speakers had already addressed earlier. This would have saved on time as well as help avoid repetitions (Henkel 91).
Conclusion It is important that meetings are planned well in advance. The people tasked with the responsibility of planning the meetings should ensure that they do not commit any of the seven deadly sins of meetings. It is important to meet the set objectives while also ensure that meetings are interesting and do not consume much time.
Reference Henkel, S. L. (2007). Successful meetings: how to plan, prepare, and execute top- notch business meetings. Ocala, Fla.: Atlantic Pub. Group.