Get help from the best in academic writing.

Michel Foucault ‘s Discourse Theory and its Relation to Dr. Seuss’s Works Essay

When speaking about Michel Foucault ‘s discourse theory and its relation to Dr. Seuss’s books, it is necessary to consider some key concepts of the philosopher’s discourse. First of all, it should be pointed out that the analysis of images and other symbolic practices as well as some ideas and thoughts is recognized to be really important process, as such analysis gives us an opportunity to focus on the so-called continuities of change.

Generally, one is to keep in mind that Foucault ‘s discourse “tells us something about the person speaking the language, the culture that that person is part of, the network of social institutions that the person caught up in, and even frequently the most basic assumptions that the person holds” (Whisnant 5). In other words, one can make a conclusion that discourse seems to be the social tool, which main purpose is to show the peculiarities of understanding human experience.

One of the most important points, which should be considered, is a historical transformation discourse theory is related to. Thus, according to Michel Foucault, small shifts are considered to be significant elements, which reflect the ways the language is expressed. For instance, when speaking about Dr. Seuss’s The Cat Not in the Hat, it becomes obvious that transformativeness inquiry is one of the key concepts of a humorous book.

On the other hand, it is also necessary to remember that children’s classic The Cat in the Hat can be analyzed differently. Laura A. Heymann is of the opinion that “reader recognition of the defendant’s recontextualization mediates any potential conflict between a reader-response view of transformativeness and the derivative work right” (464).

As far as discourses Michel Foucault speaks about affect numerous areas of life; for this reason, one is to keep in mind that discourses exist everywhere, they encompass all the genres, and Dr. Seuss’s works cannot be regarded as exceptions.

Generally, it should be pointed out that the social construction of reality Dr. Seuss highlights depends upon the chains of language Michel Foucault depicts. In other words, culture cannot exist without discourse. Discourses undergo transformations, and these changes can be traced back.

When analyzing Dr. Seuss’s works, it becomes evident that “once transformations in a given discourse happen, the new rules can spread, infiltrating their way into new areas of life and even transforming older discourses or forcing them out of practice” (Whisnant 8).

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The interdependence between Michel Foucault’s discourse theory and Dr. Seuss’s works generates the truth. For instance, the context of Dr. Seuss’s works convinces people to accept the reality. Moreover, as far as discourse communicates knowledge, it also shows us the ways people interpret the world.

Finally, cultural transformations explanation is recognized to be one of the most important aims of a discourse. As far as the production of discourse can be controlled, the author can impact on languages, images and signs he creates. In other words, the author can create his own reality and convince the readers to accept it.

However, if the reader does not understand truths of a discourse, one can state that discourses exist independently. So, taking into account Michel Foucault’s discourse theory, one can state for sure that Dr. Seuss’s works reflect cultural transformations French philosopher speaks about. In other words, the truth one accepts through the reality is considered to be absolute.

Works Cited Heymann, Laura. Everything Is Transformative: Fair Use and Reader Response. 2008. Web.

Whisnant, Clayton. Foucault

Speeches that Changed the World Compare and Contrast Essay

Nursing Assignment Help A speech encompasses an expression of a person’s feelings and thoughts using articulate sounds. Most famous speeches that have been compounded by different world leaders encompassed various message to different intended audiences. “Tear down This Wall” by President Ronald Reagan, “I have A Dream” by Martin Luther King, Jr. and “Ask not what your Country can do” by John F, Kennedy encompass famous speeches in American history.

Though the three speeches can be analyzed rhetorically using allusion and metaphor, they differ in terms of the audience for which they were intended.

Reagan alludes himself to the “I am A Citizen of Berlin” speech by Kennedy, to emphasize on the importance of liberty and freedom. This allusion enhances the clear understanding of the fact that Reagan is more interested in enhancing freedom and liberty in the world. King alludes himself to the US declaration of independence, The Gettysburg Address and the Bible, to emphasize on the fact that all human beings are created equal and should always be treated equally, regardless of their race or social background.

Kennedy alludes himself to the America’s independence, with the aim of building a good character for himself and assuring the American people that he would work towards the liberation of all and the securing of freedom for all Americans. The use of allusion in these speeches is intended to reveal to the audience the speeches’ main subject as well as to enhance the persuasiveness of the speech to the intended audience.

While Reagan’s and Kennedy’s speeches emphasize on the enhancement of freedom and liberty in the world, King’s speech emphasize on the enhancement of equality for all Americans, regardless of their Race and social standing. Metaphors are utilized in the three speeches to emphasize on the speeches’ subjects.

Kennedy uses the passage of a torch to the new generation, to emphasize on the passage of the responsibility of enhancing freedom and liberty in the world, to the new generation by the old generation. King utilizes the joyous daybreak and the long night of captivity, to emphasize on the gaining of equality by the African Americans that were initially oppressed due to race.

Reagan utilizes the tearing or the wall as a metaphor to emphasize on freedom and liberty for the world, as to him tearing of the wall is equated to according the world with freedom and liberty. Based on the metaphors, the three speeches are powerful, as they culminated to positive actions on the basis of their subjects.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More In contrast, the three speeches utilized metaphors to emphasize different message to different audiences. Kennedy’s speech was written for the American people, its allies, Foes as well as the other countries it had aided in acquiring freedom in the world. King’s speech was written for all Americans, but with particular emphasis on the African Americans that were still seeking equality in liberal America.

Reagan’s speech was written for Soviet Union’s Leader, with the aim of encouraging him to break down the Berlin Wall. Based on the different audiences for which the three speeches were composed, they work for me well because their similarities and differences manage to emphasize on the messages being passed to the three different audiences. In conclusion, though the three speeches can be analyzed rhetorically using allusion and metaphor, they differ in terms of the audience for which they were intended.

[casanovaaggrev]