Get help from the best in academic writing.

Government intervention in the economy in Malaysia

In study of economic, we had learned the economic system. Economy system is the structure of production, distribution of economic input and output and consumption of goods and services in an economy. There are 3 economic systems such as centrally planned economy system, mixed economy system and free market economy system. So, there are different country countries have different economy system.
In Malaysia, our economy system is mixed economy system. What is mixed economy system? Mixed economy system is the centrally planned economy system combine free market economy system. Put in simply, mixed economy was included free enterprise and government control or some form of direct intervention by government.
There are some characteristic of mixed economy such as: for the resource distribution, government will decides on the resource distribution of scare merchandise, a mixture of government and private ownership of the wealth ownership. Next, for the solution of economic problem, government will intervene especially to carry out development policies. The economy efficiency depends on both private sector efficiency of the economy efficiency. Other characteristic for instance, allocation of income, incomes of workers in some organization are managed by government and government provides basic services as some services are privatised in the provision of services part. Some countries are same mixed economy as Malaysia such as, India, Indonesia, and Singapore and so on.
Malaysia was a mixed economy, Malaysia are attempts to combine the advantages of Free Enterprise System and the Central Command System. The price mechanism is allowed to operate but in some cases the price mechanism fails or works against public interest. The mixed economies in Malaysia some are controlled by government some are private. The government have authority to intervene the market and economy sector, but not totally can control it.
The government can help the business people according the government legislation and regulation and market are not only included the seller, that is included the buyer, the government also have to help the consumer as make sure that the consumer are satisfy or agree that the prices of goods and services provided by the seller. So, we talk about price mechanism. What is price mechanism? Price mechanism is wide of all kinds of way to adapt the buyer and seller through price rationing, price rationing is mean that the distribution of goods and services using market and price. Due to the scarcity of resources, price rationing was needed as wants and needs are unlimited but the resources are limited, for the competing use the available goods and services must be rationed out. In order to make sure that those buyers willing and able to pay the price, markets ration merchandise by limiting the purchase only is also needed. Besides that, price mechanism is also describing the price of goods and services based on the demand and supply. But in some cases the price mechanism fails or works against public interest such as the buyer are not able and not willing to spend the money to purchase the goods and services due to the seller are put the price are not been satisfy by the majority of consumer and the seller do not comply with the price mechanism operated by the government.
Because the shortage and surplus occur in the market, the government have responsibility to overcome these problems. So, what is shortage and what is surplus? Shortage is the demand of the consumer exceeds the supply, in this situation, the goods and services is not enough to be served to the consumer by the seller. So, the producer of the goods and services will raise the price to earn more profit. Furthermore, when the market faced shortage, there are so much of inconveniences to the consumer. For example, previously we are facing the shortages of cooking oil, the government has had limited the purchase amount to maximum 2 bottle of cooking oil per every consumer which is family. The family only can buy maximum 2 bottle of cooking oil in a high price. In this case, the cooking oil will going to finish due to many consumer buy over as there are not too many stock in the market. It was lack of the cooking oil in the market and cause many negative sign, such as, the poor family unable to buy the cooking oil because the price was raise, the food seller which is needs cooking oil to produce the food was also raise the price too in order to maintain their expenses, so the consumer will pay more to get the food, it also was a negative sign.
For surplus, surplus is the supply of commodities more than the demand of the consumer. When surplus was happened, the producers have to reduce or decrease the price in order to create demand. Put it simply, surplus is mean that the price of the goods and services is high, it makes that the consumer not too willing spend the money to get the goods or services and over a period of time the goods of the market will be extra as the consumer are less purchase the goods because of the price of the goods was high. For example, a mobile phone company was launch a brand new mobile phone, this mobile phone was made by modern technology. So, this brand new mobile phone was been mass production by the company itself as the producer assume that the phone will be to sell in a huge of amount. Unfortunately, the price of the mobile phone is quite expensive. After launched to the market a period of time, the supply do not met the demand of the consumer as the consumer not willing to spend that much money to purchase that mobile phone. So, the producer will reduce the price of the mobile phone to meet the demand of the consumer.
Based on these situations, the government have responsibility to help them to make the supply able to meet to the demand of the consumer. The government was tries to help the public by using price mechanism but in some cases the price mechanism fails or works against public interest. In this situation, the government need to use other ways to correct the defects. For example, changes to taxation and welfare payments. Changes to taxation and welfare payments are the tax such as income tax, company tax, import tax, export tax, shipping tax, rental tax and so on been charged by government in a certain period. Government can charge the tax payment to the rich household and high income companies, on the contrary, charge a low price of tax payment to the poor household and low income companies. Besides that, government also can conduct a research to check for the income of the household and companies to calculate the how much the tax should they to pay by certain period of time. So, the tax payment for the household and companies will be fair to them and the company able to set the price of the product and services according to the demand because of the tax payment are been adjusted by calculate the income in every certain period of time or the companies can set the product and services in low price as the tax payment was reduced. For the household, the household has been maintained by government. So they able to pay for the product and services no matter they are rich or poor because the tax payment also being adjusted by government based on the income of the household and it also benefit to the poor household.
Another way to correct the defects by the government is price control; price control was included such as price ceiling and price floor. So, based on the situation, government may impose price ceiling to correct the defects. Price ceiling also refers to price maximum, price maximum is mean that government can set a specific price that bellow the equilibrium point in the supply and demand of consumer and supplier legally. So, the seller may not set the price exceed the maximum price given by the government. In this scenario, the consumer able to pay for purchases the goods and services. Besides that, government also have to do the market research in certain of time in order to check the price of the goods and services and tabulate the price list to adjust the level of the maximum price based on the demand and supply. If maximum price being imposed by government to the seller in a period of time, shortage will occur in the market. When shortage appears to the market, the government have to convert the maximum price to minimum price in order to make sure that overcome the shortage. Minimum price is the price above the equilibrium point in the supply and demand of consumer and supplier set by the government legally. In order to correct the defects the maximum price and minimum price will be always converted by the government so the consumer and supplier can get benefit respectively. For example, previously the government imposed a project which is adjusted the price of the petrol by every month based on the market, so the market will decides the price. The motorist will get the different of price by every month.
Lastly, the government also can intervene to correct the defects by giving more subsidies to the supplier. Subsidy is meaning that the government giving financial support to the producer and the producer will increase the supply of goods and services in a lower equilibrium price through the government subsidy. The government can give more of amount of subsidy to the producer, so the producer will able to charge a low price in their goods and services. Based on this scenario, the consumer able to pay for the goods and services, not only than that, the consumer will satisfy the price of the goods and services set by the producer. For example, the public transport companies will reduce the price of the bus fee due to government are giving them much of amount of petrol subsidy. So, the passenger can pay less for the bus fee and more passengers will willing to pay for taking the bus, the transport companies will also have benefit because of more passengers to serve.
In conclusion, the government should intervene the economy by the right way, correct the defects by using suitable solutions, overcome the economy problem by well and manage the finance by rational. It is because Malaysia is a mixed economy system, the government have to intervene it by professionally and take it seriously, if not, there will some negative indication will occur such as, supplier and consumer dissatisfaction, public conduct demonstrate because of the price of daily needs of goods increase by suddenly and so on.
Besides that, the government need to consider by rational and clear before decision making, this is because government’s decision making will impact to the public. The government also need to conduct the marketing research always in order to understanding the consumer are satisfy the price of goods and services or not and does the supplier set the price of goods and services by suitable or not, so it may reduce the market problem. When facing surplus or shortages in the market, government may take appropriate action to adjust the situation.
In this assignment, I was gain many knowledge by doing research from internet, reading the material and get some guild line from the lecturer. Other than that, I also get many use full information and details from the internet research, it may help me can apply that much of information and details to my academic.

Type Of Market Structure Of The Airline Industry Economics Essay

The type of market structure being discussed in regards to the airlines for fixing the price of air cargo is oligopoly. The market can be divided into 4 types which are monopoly, oligopoly, imperfect competition and perfect competition (Begg and Ward, 2009). The main characteristics that make up oligopoly are small number of large firms which are relatively large to the overall size of the market causing substantial market control. The extent to which the firms may control the market depends on the number and size of the firms (Begg and Ward, 2009). The other characteristic is the production of either Standard/Identical or Differentiated products. An oligopolistic firm concerned with homogeneous products, produces and processes raw materials that are often used as the input or base materials by other industries (Begg and Ward, 2009). Differentiated product systems ensure providing a wide variety of consumer goods to attain their customer’s satisfaction. The third one is entry barriers because firms who are a part of an oligopolistic market acquire and maintain their market control by keeping high entry barriers which induces literally an impossible situation for other potential firms to enter the respective industry. Even though this type of market has fixed characteristics, there are some behavioral tendencies that oligopolistic industries tend to exhibit, such as each firm keeping a watch on the rest of the other affiliated firms. A decision made by one firm can either directly or indirectly affect the other firms. The prices are fixed as these constant prices are kept by majorly all the firms. The final characteristic is relying on non-price methods of competition as well because the aim is to keep the price on one line while increasing the market share. This may be achieved by advertising, product differentiation and entry barriers or by merging two firms into one which could result in a greater market control.
1B) Cartel / Collusion is an informal secret agreement between existing firms to avoid competition (Begg, 2006). The firms cooperate with each other in order to create monopoly to achieve higher profits. The European Union had lead a probed investigation into the price fixing of the air cargo after alleged collusion charges, namely by Lufthansa Airlines, who provided the first information about the collusion ( The EU competition law explicitly forbids cartels in Article 81 on price-fixing / control of production, the two more frequent cartel-types of collusion. In the Law it explicitly indicates that heavy fines are imposed for violations and in a leniency agreement the first to withdraw of collusion agreement is free of any responsibility. This has helped a lot in detecting cartel agreements in the EU. This law prompted Lufthansa to alert commission about the cartel. The issue began with the firms looking to discuss the fuel surcharges that were taking toll. The carriers contracted that they would impose surcharges per kilo for all shipments and they did this by inducing security charges and did not pay of any of the earned commission from the security surcharges to the concerned subjects, who were the freight forwarders in this case. The base of this agreement was initiated by explicit agreements among the firms to fix output and prices. The incentive on cooperation would be earning monopoly profits. They achieved this by levying the same surcharges for all carriers and any price fluctuation in price would apply to all the airlines. According to the agreement if any carrier offers lowered prices to customers they will not receive any incentive payments. This violated the Eurpoean Union’s Competition rules and hence qualifies for penalty on the Airliners.
1C) Airliners had engaged in a Formal Collusion / Global Cartel by forming an association affecting market control by maintaining prices at a high level and thus restricting competition. Their aim is to increase their share of the markets and hence increasing their profits. Rival Airlines kept their joint interests ahead of rivalry and competition and came to this conclusion that by cooperating they can collectively increase profits. The linkage to theory of Competition and monopoly has been an important factor for firms to surrender to formal cartelization. A monopolistic market has an ‘inelastic’ demand causing it higher profits but the collusive market has fewer producers on the market and thus they have to strive harder to stay on the market.
The awfully surprising declination of the economy by 0.5% in the last three months of the year 2010 put the entire nation in shock particularly because the economists had anticipated the growth to be risen around by 0.2-0.6% ( The economic recession or slump was blamed on the bad weather of icy snow. It was predicted around early December that if the icy weather persisted, the loss to businesses could amount up to almost 6 billion, since the workers would be unable to access their workplaces due to lack of transport ( Economists argue that regardless of the unfavorable weather conditions, the economy would still have deteriorated mainly because of the recession in the construction sector. It was noted to have gone down by 3.3% by far the most severely hit sector followed by the mining sector which also suffered a percentage drop of 2.5% as evident in Figure 2 (See Appendix).
The public has fears of a double dip, but the Government believes otherwise (
There are possible factors that could help the economy, but the stabilization of it remains a question mark. The biggest confidence boost should be by the manufacturing growth, which showed an increase of GDP by 0.6% last year. The Government believes that the growth will not be as steep as was predicted for the year. But they commit to going on with huge reduction in budget and notable budget cuts plus the borrowing of lesser money, hence lesser the debt. Limitations shall be there as the VAT (Value Added Tax) is 20%. The unemployment shall be on the rise again especially with the oil prices rising.
Free trade is extremely advantageous when experiencing comparative advantage. In order to progress, countries sell goods that they can produce at very low costs and buy those services and products that would be more costly to produce. The principle of comparative advantage is based on opportunity costs. Opportunity costs are the benefits forgone from the next best alternative (Begg and Ward, 2009). Potential trading partners can gain substantially by proper specialization and exchange. The advantages of free trade are increased production and efficiency enabling countries to specialize in creating commodities where they have the comparative advantage. International trade increases market size, decreasing the productions costs and raises productivity. Increased productivity increases a countries efficiency through which they achieve better allocated resources at a cheaper price from other countries. The efficient use of these resources leads to more production, increasing the domestic output. Increased branding means more market competition which in turn helps in creating new methods and technology for production of goods. There are also benefits to consumers such as free trade leads to a global market and consumers benefit the domestic services by having a wide array of varieties. The market competition makes sure that all the services are provided at the most economical rates. It can also boost employment as jobs in the trade market increases when the productivity increases. Because trade liberalization allows resources to shift to more productive areas, absolute employment increase would be seen in the exporting industries. This in turn leads to a higher economic growth as lowering trade restrictions increases the gross domestic product. GDP can viewed as national income which is divided into components like Consumption, Investment, Government Spending and Net Exports, depending whether the scenario is for an open or a closed economy (Begg and Ward, 2009). This causes a higher standard of living, increased incomes and ultimately higher rates of economic growth. When a country sells exports to another country, it receives money in exchange for the real goods. But that money can be used only in the country importing those goods, hence causing a foreign exchange gain. International trade means global market, consequently increasing the country’s income. Countries that reduce trade restrictions have better growth chances than countries which do not. For global trade, countries must work together professionally. Working closely creates mutual respect for the respective organization’s culture and customs, eliminating any sort of discrimination.
A tax imposed by the government of one country on imports from another country allows reduced import and increased domestic production. Tariffs increase the demand price and reduce the supply price causing a lower amount of goods to be exchanged. The imposition of tariffs is justified to protect the domestic production by restricting foreign competition. The other key reasons are domestic employment as imports are goods manufactured by workers in other countries by foreign workers. Reducing the import would mean increasing the domestic production which would require a higher employee rate. Low foreign wages when stable competitive field is induced by keeping tariffs on imports which are produced by foreign people working for a lower salary compared to local goods produced by better paid domestic employees. Novice industries are protected by the government when they are relatively new in the market and not large enough to compete or benefit from economies of scale. National security is another reason when some goods can be critical to the security of the domestic economy. Posing of tariffs discourages the import of such goods. Unjust trades can be another reason when a lot of times the foreign producers engage in means of unfair trade practices by dumping imported goods at prices lower than the actual production cost.
Under normal circumstances, dumping would be carried out in order for producers of one country to stay competitive with producers in another country. This can be due to eliminating the opposing producer to gain a larger share in the market. It also helps in ridding of the stocked up goods that the producers are unable to sell off in their own local market. Producers also have the advantage of separating the two local and international markets at their own terms and charging each according to the affording potential of the purchaser. Selling goods at a higher price to a domestic buyer and decreasing its price, even below the production costs to a foreign nation is a practice followed around the world. As stated above, the US initially raised the tariffs on the Chinese tires in response to which the Chinese government imposed its tariffs on US poultry. The anti-dumping tariffs were placed against the import of US chicken meat for five years because the Chinese producers were economically being slashed by the import of the US chicken goods that were being sold far below the cost of the production.
The original issue arose in September 2009 when the US government placed a 35% tariff on Chinese automobile, two days after which the Chinese government probed investigation in to the chicken import trade. After extensive investigations, the Chinese imposed tariffs of the US imports ranging between 43.1% to 104.4%, the lower tariffs being for those companies that offered assistance in the investigations. Business would be seen to come at a competitive disadvantage for a long times because the Chinese export prices would fall lower and the imports from the US would be considerably high.