Get help from the best in academic writing.

Charles Fredrick Worth and Chanel Clothes Design Essay

The designs of Charles Fredrick Worth were more vibrant during the late nineteenth century and dominated fashion designs in Paris. Worth’s work was picked as a masterpiece that found its way to the closet of Empress Eugenie, wife to Napoleon III. Her patronage for these designs was arguably a boost since people changed perception to embrace the artist’s lavish trims and fabrics.

Although this work involved specially customized designs for individuals, the designer had attention to fitting styles and various elements suitable for exhibitions. The designer maintained high quality, focusing mainly on aesthetic fabrics.

An outstanding effect of Worth’s work was influence on liberation of the traditional woman, especially women who were not from wealthy backgrounds. Some of the profiles involved imaginative designs suitable for most women and unique fits for all feminine figures.

The designs thus bridged the gap between rich and poor by availing fashionable designs, which were previously considered as aspects for the rich. Worth used very expensive but impressive materials for his designs, some of which were from different historical periods, for instance the vintage fabrics made of silk (MacKenzie, 5).

Contrary to designs by Worth, Chanel’s work got recognition in the early twentieth century with designs that dominated women’s fashion. Gabrielle Chanel “Coco” work, which also exhibited in Paris comprised of limited outfits such as sportswear and hats and dedicated clients made her work famous. The most outstanding aspect was her use of jersey, which was common fabric for men’s under garments.

Although she initially used jersey due to its low pricing and her aim of providing fashion for all social classes, the quality of the fabric was evident in her practically simple but beautifully draping on dresses. Socially, the designs had some inspiration from men wears. Evident changes were that her designs were tidy, with spry lines particularly on the short skirts.

In line with Cumming, her inspiration was arguably on ability to provide fellow women with personal ideas fuelled from special feminine experiences and personal lifestyle (29).

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More She had ideas for good feminine appearance, which was a great requirement for the contemporary woman in early twentieth century. Social lifestyles predominantly women behaviours or appearances were the origin of Chanel’s masculine slim or straight figure with cropped hair.

Her appearance was one of the inspirations to her ideal design. Other insights to the designs were her suntanned skin, economic independence and active routines. Her fervent interests, excellent work attitude and feminine lifestyle instigated the designs to prosperity. Her social life as well as lifestyle of fellow women therefore had a huge role in the designs.

According to Klaffke, Chanel’s favourite colours were beige, white and black and the cloth designs were evidently having some elements from her personal inspiration of art.

Elements of her art collections and other theatrical aspects or themes of special interest such as theatre arts found way to her designs (191). Chanel’s designs were therefore socially able to narrow the gap between creative arts or designs and reality by implementing some abstract elements into women’s wear.

The designs were mostly her precise specifications with resilience on ensuring perfection in both design and fitting. Reminiscent of most women, her efforts were to enhance perfection on aspects relating to preference and passion in line to empowerment of the traditional woman.

The society had remarkable receptions of Chanel’s designs due to the basic fashionable appearances, global popularity and universal fits for both day as well as eveningwear. The colourful designs such as the printed chiffons, tulle, fasteners, and other decorative artistic elements added romance on majority of Chanel’s designs.

The artistic wears were soft, feminine and suitable for all seasons. Her designs after the ‘World War II’ were to liberate women who had a huge role to play during the war and reinvigorate the earlier designs thereafter. She was able to upgrade and modernize the classic look to a better symbolic design for new generations.

We will write a custom Essay on Charles Fredrick Worth and Chanel Clothes Design specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Chanel’s designs were an inspiration to women because they admired her work and considered her as a role model due to resilience to fight for gender equality in the industrial world. Influence of Chanel’s fashion designs was mainly from her attitude and this helped to bring out confidence in women by displaying the feminine natural look as opposed to designs that traditional styles of pompous clothes brought out. The artist must have been experiencing a renaissance in design.

Works Cited Cumming, Valerie. Understanding fashion history. New York, NY: Costume and Fashion Press, 2004. Print.

Klaffke, Pamela. Spree: a cultural history of shopping. Canada-Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp Press. 2003. Print.

MacKenzie, Mairi. Isms: Understanding Fashion. New York, NY: Universe Publishers, 2010. Print.

The role of prophecies in Oedipus the King Critical Essay

Nursing Assignment Help This paper is aimed at discussing the role of prophecies in the play Oedipus the King by Sophocles. In particular, it is necessary to show how different characters attempt to respond to the predictions, which they do not wish to come true, and explain the effects of their actions.

Overall, it is possible to say that by attempting to prevent the prophecies from being fulfilled, they only seal their fate and eventually suffer the misfortunes that they fear so much.

In order to better illustrate this argument, we need to speak about such characters as Laius and Oedipus. Laius is the rule of Thebes; he learns from oracle that his son Oedipus will kill him and usurp his throne.

This is why he orders Oedipus to be killed but they fail to execute his order and save the child. The main thing is that by giving this command, Laius starts a chain of events which eventually results in his death. Oedipus slaughters him without realizing that Laius is his father. Provided that this character decided to take no action in response to the prophecy, the disaster could have been averted.

This is the cruel irony of this tragedy. The main error that this character commits is that he prefers to escape his destiny rather than face it. He decides to kill his son rather than try to educate him. Certainly, Laius does not believe the course of events cannot be changed but he attemps to do by relying on brutal force instead of courage, perseverance, and love.

In his turn, Oedipus behaves in a very similar way. He is adopted by Polybus, the King of Corinth. For a very long time, he does not know that Polybus and his wife Pariboea are not his real parents. Yet, he learns from oracle that in the future, he will murder his father and marry his mother.

Oedipus flees Corinth in order to avoid this catastrophe, although he does not believe himself to be capable of committing such an atrocity. Again, if he had chosen to stay at home, the oracle’s prophecy might have never come true. Both these characters prefer to run away from danger rather than face it. This might be one of the reasons why misfortunes befall them. As it has been said before, Oedipus accidentally slaughters Laius and marries Jocasta, his mother.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More It should be noted that Oedipus mistakes his father for a mere townsman with whom he had a quarrel and killed. He feels practically no remorse for killing this person. Oedipus’ primary concern is that this man is not his father. For a long time, he lives thikning that no danger threatens him and his family. However, later he learns terrible truth about himself.

Overall, prophecies are the main drivers of the plot. Every step that characters take is an attempt to escape destiny; yet, these prophecies turned to be self-fulfilling. Sophocles makes the readers think about possible outcomes provided that the main characters had decided to take no action or to behave in a different way.

Sophocles does not try to depict human beings as creatures who are entirely devoid of free will. Both Laius and Oedipus are very strong-willed people, but sometimes they lack courage to face challenges. Through these characters Sophocles urges the reader think primarily about the ethical implications of their actions.

Works Cited Sophocles. Oedipus the King (transl. by David Grene). Chicago: University of

Chicago Press. 2010. Print.

[casanovaaggrev]