Get help from the best in academic writing.

Analysis of Jill Bolte Tailor’s Experience through the Prism of Religious Thought Term Paper

Religion and Science. Adversary or Ally? The relation between two massive bocks which denote science and religion has long been the object of research of many philosophers and scientists. Indeed, even nowadays the debates and discussions, which were supposed “to discover the truth”, did not result in the common opinion that could be agreed by everyone. (Kurtz, 48)

However, objective observations prove, that “a vast majority of scientists, physicians and mathematicians like Isaac Newton, René Descartes, the couple Curie, and many others do not divide the essence of science and religion. Carrying out different researches and working on theses, they all have come to the point of realization that this ideal world order, this wholly structured universe has been originally designed by some kind of Intelligence, which is the Creator.

“Having split the atom, having discovered the smallest particles, from which every animate and inanimate object constitutes, I have realized that science does not contradict religion. In fact, they go hand in hand with each other.” (Kurtz, 48)

According to the fact, that human nature demands explanation to each process and phenomena occurring in this world, the science has strong intention to give reasons and ground for the processes, which take place in religious world. However, such phenomena as Holly Light coming down from heaven during the period of Jesus Christ’s Resurrection cannot be fully explained, and science’s characteristic as “almighty” fades away (Harvey, 48).

Dr. Jill Taylor’S Experience On the contrary, a reasonable example of science’s ability to explain the religious phenomenon “nirvana” performs the experience of Dr. Jill Taylor. Being an intellectual, a prominent scientist, and having survived after a serious stroke, she has managed to give explanations to what we call the “loss of self”, which can be definitely considered as a state of extinguishing, nirvana.

In order not to be misled, I would like to offer to your attention the exact definition of the word “nirvana” in the Webster’s Dictionary, which states: “Nirvana is the final beatitude that transcends suffering, karma, and samsara and is sought especially in Buddhism through the extinction of desire and individual consciousness.” (Merriam-Webster, 978)

“The final beatitude” that was the climax of Dr.Jill Tailor’s speech proves the fact, that the woman’s experience can be called the religious phenomena, even though reached by non-mysterious way of relatively simple brain hemisphere dysfunction. The Doctor I talking about complete freedom of mind, about absence of any prejudicial judgments, which the left hemisphere is responsible for.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More As far as solely right hemisphere became in charge of Dr. Jill Tailor, all hints to the past or the future have disappeared, the same did the feeling of being the separate individual. The consciousness acquired freedom, which is also one of the main characteristics of nirvana.

Doctor’s state of being whole, not limited with respect to space and time can be can be undoubtedly defined as religious phenomena. The speaker has felt the absence of any boundaries in connection with universe and at this very moment Dr. Jill Tailor realized the life’s meaning and reason (Harvey, 42). She felt the real love and peace of the world, which were originally meant for this universe.

Nirvana, being “the act of mental consciousness” practically coincides with the description of Doctor’s experience, which is also the state, when the mind is clear, unprejudiced and, comparing it to the white paper sheet, unblemished with the previous experience of being the part of society. (Gombrich, 63)

In my opinion, such scientific findings do not falsify the essence of religious phenomena. On the contrary, this is only a mere instance that science has succeeded in explaining religious process and, indeed, authenticated and proved the reason for particular feeling during this state.

Works Cited Harvey, Peter Consciousness Mysticism in the discourses of the Buddha in Karel Werner, The Yogi and the Mystic London: Routledge, 1995.

Harvey, Peter “The Selfless Mind.” NY: Curzon Press 1995.

Gombrich, Richard Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1988.

We will write a custom Term Paper on Analysis of Jill Bolte Tailor’s Experience through the Prism of Religious Thought specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Kurtz, Paul Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? NY: Prometheus Books 2003.

Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 10th edition NY: Merriam-Webster, 1998.

Maria Full of Grace and De Nadie: Immigration in Terms of Shots and Angles Essay

Nursing Assignment Help Maria Full of Grace is directed by Joshua Marston with Catalina Sandino Moreno and John Alex Toro starring. In the movie Maria Full of Grace, the director represents a variety of shots to describe how various and terrible the processes of immigration for people can be: a full shot when the biker is moving along the street introduces the distance that is between the main character and this young man, and how slowly this distance becomes shorter because of current conditions; a middle shot in the same scene when Maria looks at the biker and realizes that she has the way out of her problems; a long shot may be observed in the plane when stewardesses serve the clients (the idea that they are responsible for immigrants around); a deep focus shot when the officer checks Maria (ability to observe people at the background, officer’s tool, and Maria’s frightened eyes); and a close-up shot of the drug when the dealer give the one to Maria attracts the attention to the object that plays an important role in the whole movie; extreme long shots and extreme close-up shots are not used by the director because this movies touches upon one particular story and issue, and there is no necessity to represent panoramas and close-ups.

The use of examples also deserves attention to comprehend the essence of director’s message to the viewer: a low angle (when Maria kisses the boy and looks at the sky that is so far from them), a high angle (when Maria is sitting on her bed and has to listen to her mother’s cries about her mistake), an eye-level angle (when Maria looks at her boyfriend and wants to find a drop of understanding and love), an oblique angle (when Maris talks to the young man who offers her a job), and bird’s eye angles are hard to define because there are no such scenes where situations require the overall establishing shot.

De Nadie directed by Tim Dirdamal is the movie about Central Americans who are ready to leave their native countries in order to find better life. First, the variety of shots and their purposes are mentioned: a full shot (when a man comes to the wall at the station in order to change his cloth) helps to define his status and conditions under which he has to work and live; a middle shot (when Jaime Valdez tells about the situation with immigrants) demonstrates that the person has some duties he has to complete and it does not matter what may happen around, he has a responsibility and awareness of some facts and uses his power; a long shot (when an immigrant in the blue sweater waits for the train to start working) shows that a person does not care of environment and has nothing to do but to wait for his work and his destiny; an extreme long shot (when a guard is sitting be the orange building and observes trains passing) introduces the panorama immigrants have to work at; a deep focus (at the beginning of the movie, Maria de Jesus Flores shares her experience and story and people and cars pass by on the background) creates an image of the woman with her eyes full of tears who knows what happens around but who does not have any powers to resist these problems; a close-up shot (when a man talks to the phone at the street) helps to focus on his emotions and worry about the situation he gets into; and finally, an extreme close-up shot (the same scene of a man talking to the phone) demonstrates director’s focus on the man’s lips in order to introduce how disappointed this person about the situation is.

The use of angles also becomes a helpful tool to evaluate the idea of immigration and human frustrations because of it. Different types of angles perform different functions in the movie: a low angle (when a young man tells a story of Tierra Blanca) is used to make the observation of his face traits possible; a high angle (the observation of the immigrant in the white shirt sitting by the wall) helps to recognize the conditions under which immigrants live; an eye-level angle (use almost in all scenes when the director communicates with immigrants) helps to create proper conditions for talks; a bird-level angle (the man sitting by the orange building) promotes the viewer with an opportunity to look at the panorama of the place where immigrants earn for living; and finally, an oblique angle (a visit to the hospital to Jose Medina) helps to hide the most disgusting things because of which the boy suffers.

The life of immigrants is not safe, and these people have to use any opportunity available to them and to improve the conditions they live under. It is not always possible, and such cinema techniques as shots and angles in the movies prove this cruel reality.