Get help from the best in academic writing.

A Critical Analysis of Hamlet’s Constant Procrastination in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Essay

Table of Contents Introduction

Claudius

Oedipus complex

Good vs. evil

Consequences of procrastination

Conclusion

Works Cited

Introduction It is of diminutive doubt that Hamlet is one of the most controversial characters ever created by William Shakespeare. Due to his complexity in persona, critics have over the years ever since the play’s premier varied in opinion over the true essence of Hamlet. More importantly, procrastination, which was Hamlet’s most conspicuous flaw, has had its predisposition debated over since it was first observed.

The reasons for the procrastination vary within different schools of thought with some arguing that it is due to “Oedipal Complex”, a theory conceptualized by Sigmund Freud who considered Hamlet to be in love with his mother. A supportive argument is based on the fact that Hamlet is provided with numerous opportunities to slay Claudius but always passes them on even when ordered to do so bearing in mind he deeply loathes Claudius.

Thus it is highly likely that Hamlet advertently keeps Claudius alive so as to buffer Hamlet’s predilection towards his mother. Others critics argue that he is never availed with the opportune moment to revenge of his father’s murder since he is usually preoccupied whenever such a scenario presents itself. Either way, Hamlet’s procrastination to a variable extent identifies his unstable mental condition which leads to a detrimental finale not only for Hamlet but those surrounding him as well.

Claudius Claudius is guilty of killing Hamlet’s father king Hamlet, who is also his own brother in order to gain access to the throne by marrying Gertrude, mother to Prince Hamlet.

Claudius is successful in his ambition and Hamlet is left with the decision on whether or not to kill his uncle so as to avenge his father’s death (Burnett 49). Hamlet finds himself in a dilemma that ultimately leads to his procrastination because he is aware of the fact that if he kills Claudius, his companions will avenge Claudius death by killing him.

More about Hamlet What excerpt from act 3 of Hamlet supports the conclusion that Hamlet is critical of women? 5 163 What line from act 3 of Hamlet supports the conclusion that Claudius fears his own fate? 5 59 Which statement best explains why Hamlet alludes to Pyrrhus throughout act 2, scene 2 of Hamlet? 5 199 What is the Climax of Hamlet? 5 893 Claudius is also a member of his family and so the monarch remains in possession of the throne and the crown and killing him would amount to treason, a serious crime. On the other hand, Hamlet is influenced by the urge to avenge his father’s death which further aggravated by the appearance of his father’s ghost that asks him to kill Claudius (Johnson 265).

Hamlet however doubts the actuality of the ghost and is confused on whether it was the spirit of his late father or just an evil spirit. “Be thou a spirit of health or goblin damn’d, Bring with thee airs from heaven or blasts from hell, Be thy intents wicked or charitable, Thou com’st in such a questionable shape” (Johnson 262).

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Hamlet is left with a tough decision to make that ultimately puts him at a crossroads between upholding morality or standing up for his father’s legacy (Neal 1). Such a decision becomes difficult for Hamlet to make and ponders over it for a long time leading to several incidents of procrastination with reference to the murder of Claudius (Burnett 53).

Oedipus complex Hamlet is attracted to his mother Gertrude but the presence of Claudius condenses the possibility of intimacy with his mother. Even though Hamlet believes in the vengeance of his father’s death by executing Claudius, he is afraid that the void that would be left would inevitably lead to a mutual closeness between him and his mother.

The fear of such an occurrence leads Hamlet to procrastinate the death of Claudius through self deception. He begins by investigating whether or not Claudius was responsible for killing King Hamlet not so much to find the answer since he already knew, rather to pass off time. Once he is satisfied that Claudius was indeed his father’s murderer, he embarks on a pious duty to kill him but even when presented with an opportunity, he finds a reason not to kill Claudius (Burnett 52).

During his first attempt he finds Claudius in prayer and avoids killing him alleging it is not devout to kill one in prayer. The only occasion when Hamlet does not waver to kill is when he is in the bedroom with Gertrude and stabs the man behind the curtain. Unfortunately it turns out that Polonius is the man behind the bedroom curtain (Neal 1).

It is likely that Hamlet stabs Polonius impulsively because he is in the presence of his mother and is still possessive over her. Hamlet is able to postpone killing Claudius in all other instances due to the fact that he lacks an emotional driving force at that moment akin to his mother.

Good vs. evil Hamlet is a noble and sophisticated prince who allows his deceptive attitude corrupt his mentality. Being a man of thought rather than action, Hamlet focuses his thoughts on evil leading him to become suspicious of everybody around him, and doubt every decision he makes (Johnson 262).

Deep within him Hamlet is of high moral standards and entirely despises evil but the death of his father exposes him to the need to become evil. He attempts in numerous occasions to suppress his decency and the constant conflict between his mind and conscious precipitates the procrastination evident in his demeanor.

We will write a custom Essay on A Critical Analysis of Hamlet’s Constant Procrastination in Shakespeare’s Hamlet specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Consequences of procrastination The resultant outcome of Hamlets procrastination is diverse in its reach and effect thus many individuals surrounding Hamlet are negatively affected by his inaction (Johnson 264). Hamlet at the outset is able to conceal his true affection for Ophelia hence postponing the appropriate moment to declare his true affection for her. Hamlet tries hard to identify with a mad and careless character overlooking the affection and adoration Ophelia has for him (Burnett 55).

To stay in character, Hamlet rejects her and this breaks her heart which consequently leads to Ophelia’s insanity and eventual suicide. He rejects those he claims to love including his mother whom he shouts at. Hamlet’s mad man charade arouses the curiosity of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern who keep on enquiring about the logic behind the play as they endeavor to find out hermit’s long term ideology (Neal 1).

More on the Topic Which statement best describes why Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a complex character? 5 60 Which Best Describes a Change an Adaptation Would Make If Hamlet was Set in Modern Times? 5 48 What does Hamlet mean by “shuffled off this mortal coil”? 5 194 Which word best describes Laertes in Act IV of Hamlet? 5 341 Hermit is however not pleased with the questions and he becomes highly suspicious of them, which culminates into intense rage when he discovers their true motives. He holds this against them for a long time and finally has them killed in England as a result of his built up rage and malevolence.

Hamlets deferment to kill Claudius puts Polonius in harms way when Hamlet stabs him in Gertrude’s bedroom on suspicion that he is Claudius.

Conclusion Hamlet’s procrastination could have been attributed to either his obsession with his mother, his way of thinking, his father’s death or all of the above. However, the fact is that the habitual deferment of his duties eventually led to the death of most of the people who closely associated with him. His attempt to be an evil person predisposed him to a different kind of reasoning that transformed him to be more comfortable with evil which eventually culminated in his demise.

Works Cited Burnett, MarkThornton. Ophelia’s False Steward’ Contextualized: The Review of English Studies. New York: Oxford publishers, 1995. pp. 48-56.

Johnson, Bruce. Hamlet: voice, music, sound. Popular Music. London: Cambridge University Press, 2005. pp 257-267.

Neal Thakkar: Why Procrastinate: An Investigation of the Root Causes behind Procrastination. Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal. Vol.4 (2009): 33-35. Print.

Not sure if you can write a paper on A Critical Analysis of Hamlet’s Constant Procrastination in Shakespeare’s Hamlet by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Urquhart, Alan. Hamlet and a revenge tragedy: A reappraisal. April 2004. Web.

Ontological Arguments: Anselm’s Ontological Argument Analytical Essay

Nursing Assignment Help The existence of God since time memorial has been as subject of debate with different philosophers coming up with different expressions to show that God really exists. The ontological argument primarily centers on explaining the real nature of God’s existence. Majority of these arguments are just analytic because most philosophers have based their arguments on their individual perceptions of the world.

For example, Descartes notion of existence of a perfectly supreme being is questionable because, unless one proves that the reality of the Supreme Being is coherent, then the argument is void. It is important to note here that, it is very hard for individuals to evaluate the concept of perfectionism because the idea is relative depending on the conditions at hand.

In realty most ontological arguments are mere descriptions of thoughts or individual perceptions, hence they never directly give insights on the existence of perfect beings. In addition, one main prerequisite of ontological arguments is the selectivity of words as the main mechanism of explaining or proving concepts, depending on the context under which individuals apply them.

Although this is the case, it is important to note that, although ontological arguments use specific vocabulary, the property does mean that all ontological arguments are subject to critical analysis and inquiry. This is because majority of ontological arguments use such vocabularies to prove a point, which in most cases causes a dilemma on the validness of the presented argument.

Consider Anselm’s argument on the existence of God. His definition of God as the greatest conception that the human mind can have implies that, God above all creatures is the most perfect being that exists. Regardless of the title one may accord such a being of great perfection, one main thing is for the argument’s premises to prove that in realty such a being exists.

Anselm’s argument that God is the mightiest being elucidates many questions on the real existence of the perceived God. This is because critical analysis of the question clearly shows that, it is almost impracticable to ascertain that God never exists in reality. This is because from his statement it is not wrong for one to argue that, God is omnipotent, hence can bring into existence anything that humans perceive.

Although this may be the interpretation of the mightiest nature of God, further inquiry on the existence of some things makes it hard to believe it. For instance, can God create a triangular circle? In this like a scenario, logic takes center stage, hence putting into test the ability of God to go against the rules under which philosophy bases logic.

Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More This therefore brings the argument that, God has the ability to do only what others can do, but has no power to break the rules of logic. However because it is hard to ascertain the real qualities of God, one thing remains clear is; God has the power of doing everything (Brown p.1).

On the other hand, the use of the phrase “the most possible being” implies that, no matter the circumstances or prevailing conditions, something that is possible has some aspect of real existence, hence can never cease to have the existence property. This fact therefore supports the argument, hence acting as a proof that in reality God exists.

Majority of existential claims take little consideration of the conceptual nature of things, meaning that proof forms their main mode of ascertaining concepts. In addition, in this like a case, senses take precedence, hence formulation of appropriate mechanisms of proving the same by use of empirical methods.

Although this mechanism can work in both positive and negative existential claims, sometimes it is possible to prove negative existential propositions by applying a reflective mechanism that one should base on the content on ideas at hand. In this regard, the ontological argument is an exception too because its premises try to ascertain the reality of existence.

One cannot deny that to some extent Anselm proves that for real God exist, hence the whole idea is not a human perception. However, one thing is still unclear; there is no clarity in his wrapping up of the idea that, God exists in reality and that only fools can deviate from such an idea. The order of Anselm’s ideas has some qualities of syllogism; hence, some rational flow of arguments, but it is necessary also note that, his arguments lack a firm base of expression.

This is because his ideas on existence of God are cyclical in nature and to some extent seem to originate from some religious background. The derivation of proof from a godly background, to some extent makes his proof void of some aspects of actuality philosophically.

In conclusion, due to the biases presented in Anselm’s arguments, there is a likelihood that God for real does not exist in reality; God’s existence being a mere conception of the human mind. However, basing his argument on faith, then in God’ exists not only in human perceptions, but also in reality.

We will write a custom Essay on Ontological Arguments: Anselm’s Ontological Argument specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Works Cited Brown, Curtis. Arguments for the existence of God: Anselm Ontological argument, 17 Jan. 2001. Web.

[casanovaaggrev]